15 Aug
2011
15 Aug
'11
3:21 a.m.
This is a call for consensus. Do we agree to add
infixr 6 <>
+1 Johan wrote:
Renaming return to pure would break lots of code. Adding <> doesn't have anywhere near the same implications.
Yitzchak wrote: It looks like Johan will soon be committing a disruptive change
that will break many packages.
What are those many packages that will break?
Is it necessary for the semigroups package to change the name of <> in order to make it possible to fix the broken packages in a reasonable way,
Why aren't proper imports (as mentioned earlier by Johan) enough to let both versions of <> coexist? Sebastian