27 Mar
2011
27 Mar
'11
5:21 a.m.
On 27 March 2011 11:15, Paul Johnson
2: I actually want to use timeout, which inherits the same limitation. Right now it looks like the simplest thing to do would be to copy the existing timeout code but use "waitLong" instead of "wait". But I shouldn't have to do that.
concurrent-extra to the rescue again: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/concurrent-extra/0.6.0.1/doc/htm... But note that I may move this to its own package soon (as in later today). Bas