Hello Sven, Friday, November 24, 2006, 3:00:35 PM, you wrote:
Um, no it isn't. fps 0.9 is completely API compatible with the current version. It's a performance upgrade only. We are not breaking API.
We knew this when we had it included in base, so we trimmed the API down to make it supportable. We have no problem following the rules.
If this is the case, there is no reason to *not* include fps 0.9 in "base" for 6.6.1. If we all agree that it would be better to have it somewhere else, we can do this for 6.8.
oh no! if you mean Base library here, this will continue the same problem - when something new will be added to FPS, it will be impossible to use it before 6.8 arrives. and with 6.8, all old programs will stop working because FPS changes i just try to solve our *future* problems, which you don't foresee -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com