
25 Oct
2006
25 Oct
'06
11:42 a.m.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Ross Paterson
wrote: I see you've deleted the bit about silence being taken as consent. I think we need something like this, or at least a presumption that the change will happen unless someone objects
Sometimes silence means "This idea is so crazy and useless that I don't even know where to begin in rebutting it". The lack of any positive response should not lead to an automatic presumption that the idea is OK!
I agree explicitly. (not only by being quiet :-)