29 Apr
2015
29 Apr
'15
10:28 a.m.
On 29-04-2015 13:24, Jeremy wrote:
So what's the conclusion on this? We seem to have a strong consensus on going ahead with the proposal, and a weaker consensus for doing so via the long path.
Maybe you should work out the details wrt. the concerns/things raised in the thread and do a wiki page detailing all of this? Ideally with some code to review, perhaps? In particular, if you could do a survey of Hackage to find out how many (and which) packages would be affected by this, you would earn a lot of bonus points for due dilligence! :) (I'm definitely +1 on the concept, but it's hard to judge how practical it is without estimates of breakage, etc.) Regards,