13 Dec
2017
13 Dec
'17
11:46 p.m.
On 2017-12-13 08:22 PM, David Feuer wrote:
I'm moderately opposed, on the basis that the Enum class is too fundamentally broken/meaningless to be worth fiddling with. It attempts to serve multiple barely-related purposes at once, and serves none of them terribly well. I agree it's bad, but `..` syntax is defined in terms of it, and trying to introduce breaking modifications into base is like trying to introduce my head into a brick wall.