Re: Generalizing map?

+1 for generalising map. People who think that it will break lots of code should compile some popular packages and see for themselves. As for a better/no prelude, this has been talked about for years, but a wholesale replacement of the prelude hasn't happened yet and probably won't. Waiting for something that won't happen is no reason to block gradual improvement. -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Generalizing-map-tp5766936p5767023.html Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.