3 Apr
2014
3 Apr
'14
8:32 a.m.
Jens Petersen wrote
*Haddock* - is there any reason not to use the version built and distributed with GHC 7.8?
from the package perspective also, +1 for continuing to use the haddock in ghc.
Perhaps Haddock shouldn't be included with GHC either, now that we have HP for the batteries included distribution? -- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Gearing-up-again-for-the-next-release-2... Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.