
On 6 Jan 2015, at 14:59, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
On 2015-01-06 14:57, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Johan Tibell
wrote: This is not a bugfix. A bug is failing to follow the functions specification, which *does* include following symlinks.
It's a bug in the design, not the code.
Because *nobody* wants to follow symlinks when doing "rm -rf". Even if they think they do, they *really* don't.
I agree 100%. Even time I use this function, I worry briefly about whether it follows symlinks, then think to myself "no, no-one would be so stupid to implement that deliberately in a publically available API". So it was a real shock to discover in this thread that I was wrong, and furthermore that the function is documented as doing the wrong thing. We should fix both spec and implementation, as soon as possible. Regards, Malcolm