Am Montag, 5. April 2004 13:56 schrieb Sven Panne:
[...]
I'm not sure about the module names, but simply DData as the root is not very nice. What about Data.DData? Something more descriptive would be even nicer, because the module names should describe the functionality, not the genesis of the modules. Using "DData" as the package name is fine. Suggestions welcome...
If I remember correctly, DData was intended to be the next-generation standard set of collection modules. So, maybe, we should just name the modules Data.Map, Data.Seq, etc. I think, it was already said that this should probably be done. A problem is Data.Set but there may be a solution for this. Since DData will not be one collection library beside others but *the* collection library, we should avoid the name "DData" as part of a module name.
[...]
Wolfgang