Re: [containers] Proposal: Change to the Data.Map Monoid

On 9 Oct 2015, at 08:37, Julian Bean wrote:

Would there be any downside to providing a package with a newtyped Map with all operations ported over? The newtype already exists in semigroups as UnionWith (Map k) v; what is missing is the entire Map API.

Correction. The newtype exists in the package ‘reducers’ not ‘semigroups’.