Simon Marlow wrote:
Then I'm happy for your library to be the reference for the DSP hierarchy. Unless there are any objections, I'll add that to the list.
Cool.
... I'd go with the longer names. ... Agreed. The choice about whether to put Statistics at the top level or not depends on whether it is likely to evolve into a deep hierarchy itself; if not, then Numeric.Statistics should be fine. ... In this case there might be better names though - Numeric.Random.Distribution sounds good to me.
I am going to make the naming changes mentioned in the last few emails in this thread. The potential names can be found at http://users.snip.net/~donadio/haskell/proposal.html On question, though. Is it better to have a flat hierarchy, or a descriptive, but deep one? For example, I currently have DSP IIR FIR Is it better to have DSP Filter IIR FIR so that as I implement other filtering modules, such as Adaptive and Homomorphic, they have a "proper" home and be grouped together? Thanks. -- Matthew Donadio (m.p.donadio@ieee.org)