RE: URI handling code; proposed Network.URI replacement

Thanks. (I've started trying to apply Haddock markup in my own code, but I've not yet got round to actually generating the docs from it.)
Since it's mostly backwards compatible, there's no issue with upgrading it in place. (well, there's one small issue: it introduces a dependency from the network package on the parsec package, but that's not a big deal).
Hmmm... Parsec is pretty central to what I've done.
It's not a problem: just add parsec to the PACKAGE_DEPS for the network package.
We'll arrange for CVS access so you can commit your new version to the repository.
OK.
Another detail. Do you have a preferred form of licence for this. I've been putting my own applications out as GPL to date, but I imagine that the viral effect would be problematic for the compiler library. I'm happy to use any reasonable (open) licence.
BSD-style is preferred, because the network package is already BSD licensed. A package is the unit of licensing, so libraries with different licenses have to go in separate packages (to make it easier for users to be sure that they are complying with licenses). Cheers, Simon
participants (1)
-
Simon Marlow