That package requires use of IO monad. I'd like if long double works as that of C's. 2019년 8월 30일 (금) 12:16, Matt Peddie 님이 작성:

Hi Dannyu NDos,

Have you seen the qd package (https://hackage.haskell.org/package/qd) ? Is this insufficient for your needs?

Matt

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM Dannyu NDos wrote:

...

Could we implement IEEE quadruple-precision (binary128) format? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

I see long-double package is suitable: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/long-double Could we officially adopt it? 2019년 8월 30일 (금) 12:16, Matt Peddie 님이 작성:

Hi Dannyu NDos,

Have you seen the qd package (https://hackage.haskell.org/package/qd) ? Is this insufficient for your needs?

Matt

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM Dannyu NDos wrote:

...

Could we implement IEEE quadruple-precision (binary128) format? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Yeah compensated is a great foundation. Bear in mind that is can’t do as extreme a dynamic range as a vanilla quad double but will be good for extra precision. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:53 AM Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Dannyu NDos wrote:

...

Could we implement IEEE quadruple-precision (binary128) format?

I think this is a pure Haskell implementation of the idea of representing high precision floats as sums of low precision floats: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/compensated _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries