What about adding the Maybe monad transformer as provided in MaybeT package to the transformers package? The module name could be Control.Monad.Trans.Maybe which would also avoid conflicts with the MaybeT package.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
What about adding the Maybe monad transformer as provided in MaybeT package to the transformers package?
The module name could be Control.Monad.Trans.Maybe which would also avoid conflicts with the MaybeT package.
Sounds reasonable.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
What about adding the Maybe monad transformer as provided in MaybeT package to the transformers package?
The module name could be Control.Monad.Trans.Maybe which would also avoid conflicts with the MaybeT package.
+1 I have been surprised on several occasions that MaybeT is not in the mtl. -Brent
Henning Thielemann wrote:
What about adding the Maybe monad transformer as provided in MaybeT package to the transformers package?
The module name could be Control.Monad.Trans.Maybe which would also avoid conflicts with the MaybeT package.
What MonadPlus instance will it get, if any? Ganesh ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ==============================================================================
participants (4)
-
Brent Yorgey -
Henning Thielemann -
Ross Paterson -
Sittampalam, Ganesh