fsync(2), fdatasync(2), posix_fadvise(2) and posix_fallocate(2) - Libraries - Haskell.org

newer
New version of vector + discussion

fsync(2), fdatasync(2), posix_fadvise(2) and posix_fallocate(2)

older
Use -Werror by default on travis-ci

davean

24 Jun 2014 24 Jun '14

7:55 a.m.

I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it? This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1. -davean

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 641 bytes)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Johan Tibell

24 Jun 24 Jun

8:15 a.m.

It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to actually attach the patch to the ticket. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean wrote:

I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?

This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1.

-davean

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

davean

8:24 a.m.

A patch is attached, right there as is a pull location. Not sure what else you could want. Also, the only valid states seem to be (according to trac): closed, infoneeded, merge, new, patch. I see no "Please review" state. Is how to use this documented somewhere? -davean On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to actually attach the patch to the ticket.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean wrote:

...
I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?

This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1.

-davean

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Johan Tibell

9:07 a.m.

patch = "Please review" Attachments as in Trac attachments, not links to other websites. This is probably not terribly important, but people tend to not tickets with attachments more. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:24 PM, davean wrote:

A patch is attached, right there as is a pull location. Not sure what else you could want.

Also, the only valid states seem to be (according to trac): closed, infoneeded, merge, new, patch. I see no "Please review" state. Is how to use this documented somewhere?

-davean

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...
It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to actually attach the patch to the ticket.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean wrote:

...
I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?

This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1.

-davean

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

davean

9:12 a.m.

Is this documented somewhere? It seems both I and the original submitter assumed that tickets would start in the "new" state (and likely be triage from there). -davean On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

patch = "Please review"

Attachments as in Trac attachments, not links to other websites. This is probably not terribly important, but people tend to not tickets with attachments more.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:24 PM, davean wrote:

...
A patch is attached, right there as is a pull location. Not sure what else you could want.

Also, the only valid states seem to be (according to trac): closed, infoneeded, merge, new, patch. I see no "Please review" state. Is how to use this documented somewhere?

-davean

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...
It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to actually attach the patch to the ticket.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean wrote:

...
I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?

This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1.

-davean

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Johan Tibell

9:41 a.m.

I don't know to be honest. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:12 PM, davean wrote:

Is this documented somewhere? It seems both I and the original submitter assumed that tickets would start in the "new" state (and likely be triage from there).

-davean

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...
patch = "Please review"

Attachments as in Trac attachments, not links to other websites. This is probably not terribly important, but people tend to not tickets with attachments more.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:24 PM, davean wrote:

...
A patch is attached, right there as is a pull location. Not sure what else you could want.

Also, the only valid states seem to be (according to trac): closed, infoneeded, merge, new, patch. I see no "Please review" state. Is how to use this documented somewhere?

-davean

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:

...
It was in the wrong state. Tickets with attached patches that need to be review should be put in the "Please review" state. It might also help to actually attach the patch to the ticket.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, davean wrote:

...
I can't find a reason https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8621 might have stalled but it seems like it has from my perspective. Can someone tell me I'm wrong or what to do to unstall it?

This is very useful functionality that is actually part of IEEE Std 1003.1.

-davean

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Ian Lynagh

3 p.m.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:12 PM, davean wrote:

...
Is this documented somewhere? It seems both I and the original submitter assumed that tickets would start in the "new" state (and likely be triage from there).

Near the end of step 7 on https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions/FixingBugs Thanks Ian

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

davean

25 Jun 25 Jun

7:11 a.m.

Thank you. -davean On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

...
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:12 PM, davean wrote:

...
Is this documented somewhere? It seems both I and the original submitter assumed that tickets would start in the "new" state (and likely be

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote: triage

...
...
from there).

Near the end of step 7 on https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions/FixingBugs

Thanks Ian

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

3984

Age (days ago)

3985

Last active (days ago)

Download

7 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

davean
Ian Lynagh
Johan Tibell