Proposal: Add `instance Bits Bool`
We went through all the pain of removing Num as a superclass of Bits to support it, but we apparently never actually put the instance of Bits (and FiniteBits) for Bool into base. I propose we do so. Discussion Period: 2 weeks -Edward
On 17 November 2013 19:39, Herbert Valerio Riedel
On 2013-11-10 at 23:33:31 +0100, Edward Kmett wrote:
We went through all the pain of removing Num as a superclass of Bits to support it, but we apparently never actually put the instance of Bits (and FiniteBits) for Bool into base.
I propose we do so.
+1
+1
+1
On 10 Nov 2013 23:33, "Edward Kmett"
We went through all the pain of removing Num as a superclass of Bits to support it, but we apparently never actually put the instance of Bits (and FiniteBits) for Bool into base.
I propose we do so.
Discussion Period: 2 weeks
-Edward
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
participants (4)
-
Bas van Dijk -
Conrad Parker -
Edward Kmett -
Herbert Valerio Riedel