Re: Data.* collections maintenance
Hello, I've outlined plans for the collections libraries at http://haskell.org/hawiki/StandardCollectionLibraries I've tried to find a reasonable compromise between the various opinions expressed. Also, what's the current story on moving fptools/libraries to darcs? While I agree with Sven that its not the solution to everything, I would still prefer to use it over cvs. Cheers, JP.
Hello Jean-Philippe, Sunday, October 23, 2005, 7:19:18 PM, you wrote: JPB> http://haskell.org/hawiki/StandardCollectionLibraries i propose the following plan of actions: 1) define list of datastructures which will be included in this infrastructure 2) knowing 1) we can define class hierarchy and list of functions in each class 3) knowing 2) we can define our qiuckcheck and performance tests 4) now we can go to rewrite our modules one more question: standard Haskell98 libraries has two different interfaces for collections - one in Data.List and fully different for arrays. it is likely that we will use List-like interface? btw, are you seen our PackedStrings debates? as part of this project Simon Marlow actually implemented List-like interface to unboxed immutable arrays :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com
participants (2)
-
Bulat Ziganshin -
Jean-Philippe Bernardy