Minor changes in the package description syntax
17 Feb
2005
17 Feb
'05
6:52 a.m.
Hello Guys, In the package description syntax are used ld-options and cc-options fields. In the same time the Haskell compiler options are options-ghc and options-hugs. Is there any objections to rename them to ghc-options and hugs-options? This is only better naming convention. Cheers, Krasimir
17 Feb
17 Feb
10:41 a.m.
Krasimir Angelov
Hello Guys,
In the package description syntax are used ld-options and cc-options fields. In the same time the Haskell compiler options are options-ghc and options-hugs. Is there any objections to rename them to ghc-options and hugs-options? This is only better naming convention.
I have no objections if it's not too late for GHC 6.4. peace, isaac
7398
Age (days ago)
7398
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Isaac Jones -
Krasimir Angelov