...

In an ideal world, we'd rename seq which is surely up there on the list of opaque, immemorable function names but, in this less than ideal world, using a different name for Seq would be good if someone can suggest one. (Sequence?)

Robert proposes CatenableSeq, which I like because it reflects closely the purpose of the type.

Unless someone has a better idea along this lines, I'll make the change.

I'm usually in favour of longer, more descriptive and consistent naming schemes, but in this case I vote against the longer name, simply on the grounds that the type is going to be quite widely used. Cheers, Simon