hello, haskellers Text.Html seems to generate HTML 3.2. It is too obsolete to use, isn't it? Are there any plans to support HTML 4.x or xhtml? It is true that WASH-HTML (and other libraries?) can generate xhtml. But the situation that the standard library supports legacy version of HTML only is bad. IMHO, the Text.Html should be rewrite to generate HTML 4.x, or the new library named Text.Xhtml should be introduced.
Jun Mukai
IMHO, the Text.Html should be rewrite to generate HTML 4.x, or the new library named Text.Xhtml should be introduced.
Björn Bringert modified Text.Html to produce xhtml: http://www.bringert.net/darcs/haskell-xhtml I haven't tried it myself, but it might do what you want. -- Shae Matijs Erisson - http://www.ScannedInAvian.com/ - Sockmonster once said: You could switch out the unicycles for badgers, and the game would be the same.
At 28 Nov 2005 13:06:25 +0100,
Shae Matijs Erisson
Björn Bringert modified Text.Html to produce xhtml: http://www.bringert.net/darcs/haskell-xhtml I haven't tried it myself, but it might do what you want.
Thanks. I haven't tried it also, but it seems to be good. But, I did not so strongly want excellent HTML/XML libraries. I want that the standard libararies become not obsolete. Are there any plans to introduce this Bringert's Text.Xhtml into base library? At least, Bringert's Text.Xhtml is more excellent than Text.Html and not obsolete. This is important. Best regards, Jun Mukai
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:10:41AM +0900, Jun Mukai wrote:
But, I did not so strongly want excellent HTML/XML libraries. I want that the standard libararies become not obsolete.
Text.Html is not a standard library. Best regards Tomasz -- I am searching for a programmer who is good at least in some of [Haskell, ML, C++, Linux, FreeBSD, math] for work in Warsaw, Poland
participants (3)
-
Jun Mukai -
Shae Matijs Erisson -
Tomasz Zielonka