On 17 February 2005 15:42, Isaac Jones wrote:

Krasimir Angelov <kr.angelov@gmail.com> writes:

...

Hello Guys,

In the package description syntax are used ld-options and cc-options fields. In the same time the Haskell compiler options are options-ghc and options-hugs. Is there any objections to rename them to ghc-options and hugs-options? This is only better naming convention.

I have no objections if it's not too late for GHC 6.4.

Yes, fine by me. Simon