
Is it wrong or discouraged to have both modules "A.B" and "A.B.C"? For instance, I want to create a number of modules: Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Trivial Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Logic Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Equivalence Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Type etc. ... and then have a single module that collects them all up: module Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic ( module Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Trivial, module Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Logic, module Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Equivalence, module Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Type, etc. ) where { import Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Trivial; import Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Logic; import Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Equivalence; import Org.Org.Semantic.HBase.Basic.Type; etc. } -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

Is it wrong or discouraged to have both modules "A.B" and "A.B.C"?
quite the opposite, I like this style. I often try to write A.B.Type, A.B.Operations, ... and A.B just collects them all. best regards, -- -- Johannes Waldmann ---- http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~joe/ -- -- joe@informatik.uni-leipzig.de -- phone/fax (+49) 341 9732 204/252 --
participants (2)
-
Ashley Yakeley
-
Johannes Waldmann