
16 Dec
2017
16 Dec
'17
2:26 p.m.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Marco Zocca wrote:
Would you see `vector` as more fitting than `CArray` ?
'vector' would have the advantage that it is already zero-based. Unfortunately, for matrices it is missing the second dimension. :-( Sure, 'hmatrix' is based on 'vector', too.
Last thing, would you be interested in jointly developing bindings to the sparse netlib functionality ( http://www.netlib.org/sparse/) ?
It looks like a C interface, right? My automatic generator is bound to parsing FORTRAN headers and their comments in the special format found in LAPACK and BLAS.