RE: [Template-haskell] Representation of unboxed primitives in TH
OK. Ian, I suggest that if you want to put the unboxed stuff in meanwhile, then go ahead. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: Tim Sheard [mailto:sheard@cse.ogi.edu] | Sent: 30 April 2003 16:27 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones; Ian Lynagh; Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: Sean Seefried; template-haskell@haskell.org | | At 12:25 PM 4/30/2003 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | >I'd like to hear from Tim Sheard. Tim: do you have an opinion? | | My original goal was for the data-structure that represented code | to be as simple as possible. But I can see that this isn't going | to work, since users want to "represent" any program they can write | in GHC, and that includes (generally) all the GHC extensions. | | I guess we need a strategy to address these things. This is some thing | we should address when I come to Cambridge next month. | | Tim Sheard |
participants (1)
-
Simon Peyton-Jones