May 2013 - web-devel - Haskell.org

Lista de aprova��o Cajueiro
by Edson 29 May '13

29 May '13

Lista de aprovação Cajueiro: Ribeirão Cascalheira: AMANDA SILVA DE MELO, LEONEL LOPES FERNANDES, FRANCISCO ALBERTO DA SILVA, PÂMELA VIRGÍNIA DE SOUZA, JOÃO CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DAISY CHRISTINE MELO NOGUEIRA, MARIA DENISE FEITOSA, JACQUELINE RAQUEL MENDES PATRIOTA. SAULO DEMIAN FERREIRA MAIA, ÉRICA BEZERRA DA SILVA, MAYRA FIGUEIRÊDO PEREIRA, JUAN JACKSON HOLANDA PONTE RIBEIRO, WESLEY ROGERIO ALVES. Lago do Junco. Cajueiro, ADELÂENNE KIRLEY, JULIANA RODRIGUES ALVES, ERICH DOUGLAS MOREIRA CHAVES, MAYSA RAQUEL DA SILVA, JOÃO CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, CARLOS ALEXANDRE SILVA DE LIMA, MANOEL LEYVSON MACHADO MATOS, IANN MARZZO SAMPAIO LIBOS. ROBERTO BEZERRA FERREIRA, DIONE MARIA DA SILVA, MARIANA COSTA OLIVEIRA, JORGE ROBERTO PRUDENCIO NASCIMENTO, THALITA JESSICA FERREIRA DA ROCHA. Caeté. Nova Redenção e ANA CAROLINE LIMA VASCONCELOS, LÍVIO CHAVES DÔDÔ, FRANCISCO JACKSON DE FREITAS SOUZA, PAULO WILLAME ARAUJO DE LIMA, JOÃO CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DAMIÃO ROCHA DOS SANTOS JÚNIOR, MARIA HELENA DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, JARDEL DE LIMA NOBRE. SILVANA BEZERRA DA SILVA, ARIELA DE MACEDO RICARDO, LUCAS PINTO ASSUNCAO, GLAUCIO VALENCA PEREIRA RANGEL, REBECA FARIAS CARNEIRO. Itauçu.

1 0

Re: [web-devel] [Haskell-cafe] Fwd: Backward compatibility
by Alberto G. Corona 05 May '13

05 May '13

Well, the main one is that is in the group of continuation based frameworks, like other advanced web frameworks such are seaside (smalltalk) ocsigen (ocaml) or coccoon (JavaScript) . That means that it is not based on the event model, and the flow is in a single procedure. This makes the navigation much more readable, as a console application. But WASH is not continuation based, but log based, and the log was stored in the client, that means that it was also restful to a certain level. That approach solved the big problems of memory usage and serialization of continuation based frameworks. It also solved the problem of form safety before the development of formlets and the widespread of applicative functors. But I do not pretend to resucitate WASH. I just miss a continuation of this line of work , but this was not the case. I took a deeper look at WASH after developping MFlow, years after the discontinuation of WASH. MFlow coincidentally, is log based in a different way. I supposed that it was based on continuations, and I didn't like them, but it was not. If the project would have been prosecuted, who knows...It had a edge over other web developments in other languages, but it was hard to understand, just because the approach was original and unique. I consider MFlow as a continuation of WASH in "philosophical" terms. 2013/5/6 Tom Ellis <tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013(a)jaguarpaw.co.uk> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote: > > The case of WASH is a pity. Architecturally It was more advanced that > many > > recent haskell web frameworks. The package would have been a success > with > > little changes in the DSL syntax. > > Could you briefly summarise the difference between WASH's approach and that > of the more recent frameworks? > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe(a)haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- Alberto.

1 0

A three page web application in a tweet (in Haskell)
by Alberto G. Corona 03 May '13

03 May '13

Hi, Just to share my excitement with you: https://twitter.com/AGoCorona/status/329648864082677760 See the link in the tweet for an explanation Best Regards, -- Alberto.

1 0