- web-devel - Haskell.org

QuickCheck / Unit Testing Yesod apps?
by Ian Duncan 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

I'm wondering if anybody has developed an effective methodology so far for implementing tests for yesod apps. Ideally, I'd like to use QuickCheck to hammer some stuff I'm working on, but I'm having trouble figuring out the best way to do so. Any help would be appreciated.

3 2

yesod IRC meeting summary
by Greg Weber 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

# Groundhog We discussed Persistent and Groundhog with Boris, the author of Groundhog who was kind enough to show up and meet with us. The differences were summarized: * groundhog uses gadts to greatly clean up PersistEntity, and to avoid the need for a bunch of associated types and extra constructors. downside: gadts + type families is a ghc 7 feature, although it might be possible to use phantom types and support ghc6 * persistent requires all datatypes be defines through its QQ syntax, groundhog allows types to be declared as normal. i think this allows persistent to sidestep a lot of sticky naming issues, but groundhog is more flexible * groundhog supports "and" and "or", persistent only supports "and * groundhog use operators, persistent uses constructors * groundhog supports complex arithmetic expressions * groundhog supports comparing fields to fields >From a Persistent standpoint we want all of these features. There are a few minor issues we didn't like, such as preferring our current naming convention to groundhog's, in which 'Field' is appended to every field instead of pre-pending the table name. The main thing we didn't like about Groundhog is its support for Sum data types, which is a neat feature, but complicates the rest of the persistence library, and makes some other functionality more difficult. There are also a few other implementation differences. The direction we want to take Persistent is to incorporate all the good features. This means breaking the current API to make a much nicer one. We plan on providing an upgrade script, much like the upgrade script from hamlet 6 to 7. After Yesod hits 1.0 we will be much more careful to change APIs, all the more reason to make some more drastic changes now. Boris was even kind enough to offer his help in incorporating these features in into Persistent. But 1) he wants to see how it all shakes out first and 2) we don't want to limit his excellent experimentation, so there will be no official merge now. We will continue to try to standardize the APIs of the 2 packages. # Future Meeting Technologies Text meetings can seem a bit laborious at times, although it makes it easy to write this summary. Particularly if we want to hack on some code, it would be much nicer to have audio. I tried out the EVO conferencing tool that was suggested. From a UI standpoint it was a craptacular Java Servlet. It does seem quite featureful, although audio did not work by default on my Ubuntu computer, and the window was annoyingly shaky, possible it doesn't like XMonad. It also uses quite a bit of CPU. So I don't think this is a good solution. I am open to other suggestions. Here are others that I found, but have not tried yet: * https://www.webhuddle.com/ * http://www.openmeetings.de/ Otherwise, we will just do skype breakout sessions as needed. # Future meeting times I created a doodle that people can mark time on next week: http://doodle.com/av92qzmvwyh48hcs Doodle isn't really setup well for large ranges of time though.

1 0

Yesod developer meeting (IRC)
by Michael Snoyman 18 Jun '11

18 Jun '11

Hi everyone, We'd like to arrange a Yesod developer meeting this Sunday (June 19). The purpose is to get some discussion going on various open issues (yesod devel, for instance) and to get more direct discussions going on where we should be focusing. Of course, time zone issues make this a bit difficult to plan. (And also make it almost impossible that everyone will be meeting on their Sunday.) Can we have a shout-out from anyone interested in attending on what would be a good time (please give in UTC). It might be inevitable that we need to have these meetings at two different times of day, but let's at least shoot for a single slot for the moment. Representing Israel: Saturday: Normally I could be available on a Saturday night, but I'm unavailable this week. Sunday: UTC 4:00-18:00[1] Michael [1] In case you're all wondering why I don't have a life, Sunday's actually a work day in Israel.

9 18

Content-Length on sendFile
by Nubis 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Hi guys, Just wanted to give you a heads up that yesod's sendFile is not setting the Content-Length header, which 'breaks' some proxies and load balancers. (in our case, amazon elastic load balancer). I don't know if that's by design, I'm not 100% sure but not setting the header would be only useful for 'long pooling' of binary files for doing some sort of hackish http streaming, which I don't think is yesod's purpose anyways :) A workaround is setting the Content-Length header before calling sendFile, I guess it may be something easy to add, I was going to propose a patch that just wraps the current implementation in a do block that sets the header, but then I noticed a number of optimizations being made that hint there should be a 'better' way. cheers! ----nubis :)

8 31

Yesod static file approach
by Michael Snoyman 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Hi all, OK, I think we've gotten some good ideas, I'd like to make some concrete proposals based on everyone's input: * Warp should be modified to perform the stat() system call to get the content-length when none is provided. * In order to avoid the system call twice, we will pass the content-length (wherever it comes from) to simple-sendfile. * wai-app-static and yesod-static are being updated to support embedded files. It's unclear if that will be a speed gain versus filesystem serving, because: * Filesystem serving gets to use sendfile, which skips a memory copy from user space to kernel space * On the other hand, embedded serving avoids touching the hard drive... * But the file may be cached * (Not yet discussed): In addition to sendFile, let's provide a sendEmbeddedFile function * And let's make sure all this information is reflected in the docs. Any thoughts? Michael

1 0

[Yesod] how to switch template by languages.
by Katsutoshi Itoh 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Hi. I tried my multilingual programs Although I was treated with a short statements _ {MsgFoo}, there are cases where you want to convert the amount of coherent document. Specifically, messages, etc. and help the Site Terms. Together in one file and coherent documents. Japanese version of the file and file has a different English. I have to interpolate as a template, it will switch should I do? thanks. --- Katsutoshi Itoh (cutsea110)

2 1

Re: [web-devel] Yesod Sessions
by Michael Snoyman 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Yes, you're correct. That was one of the major goals in the design. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Blake Rain <blake.rain(a)massivetactical.com> wrote: > Hey Michael, > > Am I correct in my understanding that in order for two instances of the > same Yesod application to share session information, they simply need to > yield the same Key[1] from their encryptKey[2] functions? > > If this is the case, then I should not have any problem load-balancing > over a number of servers, and I won't have to bother with "sticky > sessions". > > Thanks in advance, > > - B. > > [1] > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/clientsession/0.6.0/doc/html/We… > [2] > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/yesod-core/0.8.2/doc/html/Yesod… > > >

1 0

Re: [web-devel] [Haskell-beginners] Options for creating a multiple select form via Yesod
by Michael Litchard 15 Jun '11

15 Jun '11

Oh sweet! Thanks! On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:43 AM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: > I think I'll give it a shot. Fun problem and something I'll > definitely need eventually. I'll try and get you a pull request > tonight if all goes well. > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Thank you for the analysis, you're absolutely correct that this is a >> shortcoming in the API of yesod-form as it stands. I had an idea for a >> possibly simple modification to fix the situation: change fieldParse >> to >> >> [Text] -> Either msg (Maybe a) >> >> We don't really want to support returning singles or doubles from the >> same Field; a multiSelectField will automatically make the "a" >> variable a list. Said another way, the types should be: >> >> selectField :: [(Text, a)] -> Field xml msg a >> multiSelectField :: [(Text, a)] -> Field xml msg [a] >> >> Another related change: we don't really need to separate out >> fieldRender from fieldView I believe. Instead, we can have fieldView >> be: >> >> fieldView :: Text -- ^ ID >> -> Text -- ^ name >> -> a -- currently, this is another Text >> -> Bool -- ^ required? >> -> xml >> >> I'm willing to test out these changes myself, but wanted to (1) get >> input from you and (2) see if you or anyone else wanted to take a >> crack at it. >> >> Michael >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:25 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>> I gave a shot at this last night,and didn't quite pull it off. But I >>> got pretty far and I'd rather you have my work than try it from >>> scratch. >>> >>> The first method won't work because the Field type is used in >>> validating the get parameters in the mhelper function in >>> yesod.form.functions. That means that you have to have a unified type >>> for field that can do everything. Maybe there is a more succinct way >>> with classes, but I just couldn't think of an elegant way to do it >>> that way. >>> >>> So what I tried to do was make the fieldParser callback into its own type: >>> >>> newtype FieldParser msg a = FieldParser (Either >>> (Maybe Text -> Either msg (Maybe a)) >>> (Maybe [Text] -> Either msg (Maybe [a]))) >>> >>> That means a field parser can either take one text and return one >>> item, or it takes a list and returns a list of items. >>> >>> Then I went through Yesod.Form.Fields and changed about 12 or 15 references of >>> { fieldParse = blank $ \s -> >>> to >>> { fieldParse = FieldParser . Left $ blank $ \s -> >>> >>> Cool, now when you write your multipleSelectField, you'll set the fieldParser to >>> FieldParser . Right $ etc... >>> >>> The very last thing you have to do to fix this is the mhelper >>> function, which is where I lost steam. Right now it looks up the name >>> of the field in the get/post params that were passed in, and then >>> hands the value to fieldParse. What it needs to do is check to see >>> whether Field Parser is left or right, and then pass in the params >>> slightly differently depending on which it is. I don't know how the >>> parameters will end up getting passed into askParams though. Right >>> now askParams returns a list of names to value pairs, so hopefully you >>> will end up with a list of multiple entries for the name of your mutli >>> select and a different value for each entry, which you need to filter >>> out and collect into a single list and then run the fieldParser on it. >>> >>> Hopefully that is not too bad. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>> Well I will try the easier way first, and having accomplished that I >>>> will look into doing it the better way. If people can call dibs, I'd >>>> like to. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>>> After looking at the source, you should be aware that >>>>> >>>>> 1) yesod-form has been updated to 2.0, >>>>> 2) it is a lot easier to understand than 1.x was. >>>>> >>>>> The main obstacle I see is that the library uses the Field datatype, >>>>> that has a fieldParse method of Maybe Text -> Either msg (Maybe a). >>>>> The problem with that is that a multiple select box should require >>>>> [Text] or perhaps Maybe [Text] rather than Maybe Text. It is making >>>>> the assumption that there can only be one piece of data per field, >>>>> which holds for everything except multiple selects and multiple radio >>>>> buttons. >>>>> >>>>> So looking at this, it looks like you'd have to add another field type >>>>> "FieldMulti" to Yesod/Form/Types.hs, which allows for multiple values. >>>>> Then add a new version of selectFieldHelper that accepts fieldMultis >>>>> instead of fields, and then it is trivial to change selectField to be >>>>> a multi field. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively you could change Field to accept either single or >>>>> multiple values and change its use everywhere else, which is probably >>>>> the better answer, but more involved. >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if this is the best way to go about it, but it seems like >>>>> it should work. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>> Thank you David. I'm trying to figure out step-by-step, exactly how >>>>>> selectFields binds field values. One thing I'm having trouble with is >>>>>> visualizing return values. >>>>>> Beginning with askParams. >>>>>> >>>>>> askParams :: Monad m => StateT Ints (ReaderT Env m) Env >>>>>> askParams = lift askenv <- askParams >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's the example from selectFields >>>>>> env <- askParams >>>>>> later on env is used in with the lookup function >>>>>> >>>>>> let res = case lookup name env of >>>>>> seeing as lookup is checking for value of type a in a [(a,b)] >>>>>> and given the type of askParams >>>>>> I have no idea what is going on here. I don't see a [(a,b)] in >>>>>> askParams :: Monad m => StateT Ints (ReaderT Env m) Env. >>>>>> >>>>>> So if someone could answer how env <- askParams yields a [(a,b)] for >>>>>> lookup to use as input, I would appreciate it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>>>>> The read function is sort of the opposite of the show function. Take >>>>>>> a string, give me a value. reads is like read, however it has some >>>>>>> traits that read doesn't have. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem with read is that if you go: read "asdf" :: Int, it will >>>>>>> die with an exception, and that is something you don't want in a web >>>>>>> app. Also it doesn't tell you what the rest of the string is, so you >>>>>>> have no real way of finding out what was left of the string after the >>>>>>> part you wanted to parse. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So there is the reads function that returns [(a,String)] which is a >>>>>>> list of pairs of the answer a, and the rest of the string String. As >>>>>>> a bonus, it returns a list so if it can't parse the string you pass >>>>>>> it, then it just returns an empty list. Why didn't it use Maybe you >>>>>>> ask? I bet it probably has to do with the function being one of the >>>>>>> first functions ever written for haskell, long before Maybe existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So all it is there is unpack this bytestring into a string, then parse >>>>>>> it into a value, and please don't blow up if the input is invalid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> I was a bit hasty. I can render a multi-select field easily enough. >>>>>>>> However, I'm having difficulty following how selectField makes a value >>>>>>>> from the select field accessible from the handler code calling >>>>>>>> selectField. Once I figure that out, I can modify multiSelectField >>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The goal here being to modify selectField so that a list of field >>>>>>>> values can be bound . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's what I have so far: >>>>>>>> multiSelectField is thus far identical in every way to selectField >>>>>>>> save for the following change in the Hamlet part. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <select multiple="#{theId}" id="#{theId}" name="#{name}"> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My thinking was that the value bound to multiple was arbitary, and I'd >>>>>>>> use theId until I figured out something that made more sense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's where I am focusing my efforts next >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://hpaste.org/47774 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Specifically >>>>>>>> (x', _):_ -> >>>>>>>> case lookup x' pairs' of >>>>>>>> Nothing -> FormFailure ["Invalid entry"] >>>>>>>> Just (y, _) -> FormSuccess y >>>>>>>> I'm thinking this is where selectField binds a value from the select >>>>>>>> field form. I'm confused by the (x',_):_. At first I thought it meant >>>>>>>> that just the first pair in a list of pairs is pattern matched >>>>>>>> against, and the rest discarded. But then I ask myself where the list >>>>>>>> is coming from. In a select field there would only be one pair, not a >>>>>>>> list of them. Here's where I get confused. Because if this is not >>>>>>>> where the values of the select field get bound, I don't know where >>>>>>>> it's happening. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is my confusion clear enough such that I could get some clarifying >>>>>>>> feedback? If not, what is unclear? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The best way for code contributions in general is to submit a pull >>>>>>>>> request on Github. If that's a problem, sending a patch via email >>>>>>>>> works as well (either directly to me or to web-devel). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hey! I just added multiSelectField to the Forms library. I'm only >>>>>>>>>> getting the first value selected, but I think that's because of how >>>>>>>>>> I'm using multiSelecrField. I'm going to try to change the client code >>>>>>>>>> to fix this. I'll let you know how it goes. when I get a >>>>>>>>>> maybeMultiSelectField added I'll show you what I have. What would be >>>>>>>>>> the best way to submit this? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There's nothing jQuery or Javascript specific about a multi-select >>>>>>>>>>> field: it's just a normal select field with a "multiple" attribute. I >>>>>>>>>>> would recommend taking the selectField code from yesod-form and >>>>>>>>>>> modifying it to be multi-select. I'll likely do this myself >>>>>>>>>>> eventually, but it could be a good learning experience in Yesod (and a >>>>>>>>>>> great introduction to contributing to the framework if you're so >>>>>>>>>>> inclined). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to create a multiple select form, as illustrated on the following: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://api.jquery.com/selected-selector/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the options I see possible: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (1) Write a jQuery widget. >>>>>>>>>>>> (2) Use plain javascript via Julius >>>>>>>>>>>> (3) Use the low-level functions in Yesod.Form to write a widget >>>>>>>>>>>> (4) Use a pre-existing function that does what I need, but am not >>>>>>>>>>>> aware of this functionality >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (1) has appeal as it looks like something small I can contribute to >>>>>>>>>>>> the project. It will take me some extra time to figure out the >>>>>>>>>>>> details. But, I had a look at the other jQuery widgets and they seem >>>>>>>>>>>> to provide an approachable model to follow. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (2) This looks like the most straight-forward approach. I'm just >>>>>>>>>>>> learning javascript so would have to figure out how to capture values >>>>>>>>>>>> in Haskell from the form. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (3) This looks like the most difficult way. I don't think I know >>>>>>>>>>>> enough about the low-level functions in Yesod.Form to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>> accomplish this in a timely manner. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (4) This is the best scenario. There's already a way to do this right >>>>>>>>>>>> now, and I just haven't identified it. If this is the case, I would >>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate being pointed in the right direction. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Until informed otherwise, I'm evaluating options 1 and 2. All feedback >>>>>>>>>>>> welcomed. Thanks to all who made Yesod possible. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Beginners mailing list >>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners(a)haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >

2 3

Re: [web-devel] [Haskell-beginners] Options for creating a multiple select form via Yesod
by Michael Litchard 15 Jun '11

15 Jun '11

I took a look at hello-forms.hs and this was my clue myForm = fixType $ runFormGet $ renderDivs $ pure (,,,,,,) <*> areq boolField "Bool field" Nothing <*> aopt boolField "Opt bool field" Nothing <*> areq textField "Text field" Nothing <*> areq (selectField fruits) "Select field" Nothing <*> aopt (selectField fruits) "Opt select field" Nothing <*> aopt intField "Opt int field" Nothing <*> aopt (radioField fruits) "Opt radio" Nothing The aopt and areq look new. As far as I can tell, this looks like it should do what I needed. I'm eager to try it out. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: > I haven't finished. I was making the changes he suggested, but found > a problem. I sent him a question but he's probably a busy guy. > > I don't see the changes in his github page, where are you getting this > from? If you have found them, it is just a matter of taking the > package, cabal configure, cabal install and then it should be > available for all your coding needs. > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >> David, >> I checked-out yesod-forms from the repository and see that >> you've made the changes. Thank you once again. My follow-up question >> is for anyone who cares to answer. How do I swap the new yesod-forms >> and the old one from 0.2.0? I don't want to hose >> my system. This is new ground for me. >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>> Oh sweet! Thanks! >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:43 AM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>> I think I'll give it a shot. Fun problem and something I'll >>>> definitely need eventually. I'll try and get you a pull request >>>> tonight if all goes well. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for the analysis, you're absolutely correct that this is a >>>>> shortcoming in the API of yesod-form as it stands. I had an idea for a >>>>> possibly simple modification to fix the situation: change fieldParse >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>> [Text] -> Either msg (Maybe a) >>>>> >>>>> We don't really want to support returning singles or doubles from the >>>>> same Field; a multiSelectField will automatically make the "a" >>>>> variable a list. Said another way, the types should be: >>>>> >>>>> selectField :: [(Text, a)] -> Field xml msg a >>>>> multiSelectField :: [(Text, a)] -> Field xml msg [a] >>>>> >>>>> Another related change: we don't really need to separate out >>>>> fieldRender from fieldView I believe. Instead, we can have fieldView >>>>> be: >>>>> >>>>> fieldView :: Text -- ^ ID >>>>> -> Text -- ^ name >>>>> -> a -- currently, this is another Text >>>>> -> Bool -- ^ required? >>>>> -> xml >>>>> >>>>> I'm willing to test out these changes myself, but wanted to (1) get >>>>> input from you and (2) see if you or anyone else wanted to take a >>>>> crack at it. >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:25 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>>>> I gave a shot at this last night,and didn't quite pull it off. But I >>>>>> got pretty far and I'd rather you have my work than try it from >>>>>> scratch. >>>>>> >>>>>> The first method won't work because the Field type is used in >>>>>> validating the get parameters in the mhelper function in >>>>>> yesod.form.functions. That means that you have to have a unified type >>>>>> for field that can do everything. Maybe there is a more succinct way >>>>>> with classes, but I just couldn't think of an elegant way to do it >>>>>> that way. >>>>>> >>>>>> So what I tried to do was make the fieldParser callback into its own type: >>>>>> >>>>>> newtype FieldParser msg a = FieldParser (Either >>>>>> (Maybe Text -> Either msg (Maybe a)) >>>>>> (Maybe [Text] -> Either msg (Maybe [a]))) >>>>>> >>>>>> That means a field parser can either take one text and return one >>>>>> item, or it takes a list and returns a list of items. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I went through Yesod.Form.Fields and changed about 12 or 15 references of >>>>>> { fieldParse = blank $ \s -> >>>>>> to >>>>>> { fieldParse = FieldParser . Left $ blank $ \s -> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool, now when you write your multipleSelectField, you'll set the fieldParser to >>>>>> FieldParser . Right $ etc... >>>>>> >>>>>> The very last thing you have to do to fix this is the mhelper >>>>>> function, which is where I lost steam. Right now it looks up the name >>>>>> of the field in the get/post params that were passed in, and then >>>>>> hands the value to fieldParse. What it needs to do is check to see >>>>>> whether Field Parser is left or right, and then pass in the params >>>>>> slightly differently depending on which it is. I don't know how the >>>>>> parameters will end up getting passed into askParams though. Right >>>>>> now askParams returns a list of names to value pairs, so hopefully you >>>>>> will end up with a list of multiple entries for the name of your mutli >>>>>> select and a different value for each entry, which you need to filter >>>>>> out and collect into a single list and then run the fieldParser on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopefully that is not too bad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Well I will try the easier way first, and having accomplished that I >>>>>>> will look into doing it the better way. If people can call dibs, I'd >>>>>>> like to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> After looking at the source, you should be aware that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) yesod-form has been updated to 2.0, >>>>>>>> 2) it is a lot easier to understand than 1.x was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The main obstacle I see is that the library uses the Field datatype, >>>>>>>> that has a fieldParse method of Maybe Text -> Either msg (Maybe a). >>>>>>>> The problem with that is that a multiple select box should require >>>>>>>> [Text] or perhaps Maybe [Text] rather than Maybe Text. It is making >>>>>>>> the assumption that there can only be one piece of data per field, >>>>>>>> which holds for everything except multiple selects and multiple radio >>>>>>>> buttons. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So looking at this, it looks like you'd have to add another field type >>>>>>>> "FieldMulti" to Yesod/Form/Types.hs, which allows for multiple values. >>>>>>>> Then add a new version of selectFieldHelper that accepts fieldMultis >>>>>>>> instead of fields, and then it is trivial to change selectField to be >>>>>>>> a multi field. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alternatively you could change Field to accept either single or >>>>>>>> multiple values and change its use everywhere else, which is probably >>>>>>>> the better answer, but more involved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know if this is the best way to go about it, but it seems like >>>>>>>> it should work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Thank you David. I'm trying to figure out step-by-step, exactly how >>>>>>>>> selectFields binds field values. One thing I'm having trouble with is >>>>>>>>> visualizing return values. >>>>>>>>> Beginning with askParams. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> askParams :: Monad m => StateT Ints (ReaderT Env m) Env >>>>>>>>> askParams = lift askenv <- askParams >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's the example from selectFields >>>>>>>>> env <- askParams >>>>>>>>> later on env is used in with the lookup function >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> let res = case lookup name env of >>>>>>>>> seeing as lookup is checking for value of type a in a [(a,b)] >>>>>>>>> and given the type of askParams >>>>>>>>> I have no idea what is going on here. I don't see a [(a,b)] in >>>>>>>>> askParams :: Monad m => StateT Ints (ReaderT Env m) Env. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So if someone could answer how env <- askParams yields a [(a,b)] for >>>>>>>>> lookup to use as input, I would appreciate it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, David McBride <dmcbride(a)neondsl.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> The read function is sort of the opposite of the show function. Take >>>>>>>>>> a string, give me a value. reads is like read, however it has some >>>>>>>>>> traits that read doesn't have. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The problem with read is that if you go: read "asdf" :: Int, it will >>>>>>>>>> die with an exception, and that is something you don't want in a web >>>>>>>>>> app. Also it doesn't tell you what the rest of the string is, so you >>>>>>>>>> have no real way of finding out what was left of the string after the >>>>>>>>>> part you wanted to parse. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So there is the reads function that returns [(a,String)] which is a >>>>>>>>>> list of pairs of the answer a, and the rest of the string String. As >>>>>>>>>> a bonus, it returns a list so if it can't parse the string you pass >>>>>>>>>> it, then it just returns an empty list. Why didn't it use Maybe you >>>>>>>>>> ask? I bet it probably has to do with the function being one of the >>>>>>>>>> first functions ever written for haskell, long before Maybe existed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So all it is there is unpack this bytestring into a string, then parse >>>>>>>>>> it into a value, and please don't blow up if the input is invalid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I was a bit hasty. I can render a multi-select field easily enough. >>>>>>>>>>> However, I'm having difficulty following how selectField makes a value >>>>>>>>>>> from the select field accessible from the handler code calling >>>>>>>>>>> selectField. Once I figure that out, I can modify multiSelectField >>>>>>>>>>> accordingly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The goal here being to modify selectField so that a list of field >>>>>>>>>>> values can be bound . >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here's what I have so far: >>>>>>>>>>> multiSelectField is thus far identical in every way to selectField >>>>>>>>>>> save for the following change in the Hamlet part. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <select multiple="#{theId}" id="#{theId}" name="#{name}"> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My thinking was that the value bound to multiple was arbitary, and I'd >>>>>>>>>>> use theId until I figured out something that made more sense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here's where I am focusing my efforts next >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://hpaste.org/47774 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Specifically >>>>>>>>>>> (x', _):_ -> >>>>>>>>>>> case lookup x' pairs' of >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing -> FormFailure ["Invalid entry"] >>>>>>>>>>> Just (y, _) -> FormSuccess y >>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking this is where selectField binds a value from the select >>>>>>>>>>> field form. I'm confused by the (x',_):_. At first I thought it meant >>>>>>>>>>> that just the first pair in a list of pairs is pattern matched >>>>>>>>>>> against, and the rest discarded. But then I ask myself where the list >>>>>>>>>>> is coming from. In a select field there would only be one pair, not a >>>>>>>>>>> list of them. Here's where I get confused. Because if this is not >>>>>>>>>>> where the values of the select field get bound, I don't know where >>>>>>>>>>> it's happening. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is my confusion clear enough such that I could get some clarifying >>>>>>>>>>> feedback? If not, what is unclear? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> The best way for code contributions in general is to submit a pull >>>>>>>>>>>> request on Github. If that's a problem, sending a patch via email >>>>>>>>>>>> works as well (either directly to me or to web-devel). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey! I just added multiSelectField to the Forms library. I'm only >>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the first value selected, but I think that's because of how >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using multiSelecrField. I'm going to try to change the client code >>>>>>>>>>>>> to fix this. I'll let you know how it goes. when I get a >>>>>>>>>>>>> maybeMultiSelectField added I'll show you what I have. What would be >>>>>>>>>>>>> the best way to submit this? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael(a)snoyman.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's nothing jQuery or Javascript specific about a multi-select >>>>>>>>>>>>>> field: it's just a normal select field with a "multiple" attribute. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would recommend taking the selectField code from yesod-form and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifying it to be multi-select. I'll likely do this myself >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually, but it could be a good learning experience in Yesod (and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> great introduction to contributing to the framework if you're so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclined). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Michael Litchard <michael(a)schmong.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to create a multiple select form, as illustrated on the following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://api.jquery.com/selected-selector/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the options I see possible: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) Write a jQuery widget. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (2) Use plain javascript via Julius >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) Use the low-level functions in Yesod.Form to write a widget >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) Use a pre-existing function that does what I need, but am not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aware of this functionality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) has appeal as it looks like something small I can contribute to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the project. It will take me some extra time to figure out the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> details. But, I had a look at the other jQuery widgets and they seem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to provide an approachable model to follow. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (2) This looks like the most straight-forward approach. I'm just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learning javascript so would have to figure out how to capture values >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Haskell from the form. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) This looks like the most difficult way. I don't think I know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough about the low-level functions in Yesod.Form to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accomplish this in a timely manner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (4) This is the best scenario. There's already a way to do this right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, and I just haven't identified it. If this is the case, I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate being pointed in the right direction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until informed otherwise, I'm evaluating options 1 and 2. All feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> welcomed. Thanks to all who made Yesod possible. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Beginners mailing list >>>>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Beginners mailing list >>>> Beginners(a)haskell.org >>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >>>> >>> >> >

1 1

unicode domain and path
by Jeremy Hughes 14 Jun '11

14 Jun '11

Hi, The type of both host and path fields of http-enumerator's Request type is ByteString/Ascii. Does this mean using unicode URLs vai encodeUtf8 is a no go? J

3 5