
I agree that this isn't optimal (and should be avoided in the long-term), but is it problematic in practice? It seems that the main problem would be if the name conflicted with an existing one- but we are willing to put the burden on the user to create a unique package name. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Felipe Almeida Lessa < felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Michael Snoyman
wrote: * direct-plugins can only load up installed packages, so "yesod devel" will actually install your package.
Wasn't this one of the reasons to ditch/extend direct-plugins? Installing may not be something very consistent with the idea that "yesod devel" invokes, IMHO.
Cheers,
-- Felipe.
_______________________________________________ web-devel mailing list web-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel