
Hello Michael and everyone, I think that it is very repetitive to need to specify what actions can or cannot be done on every field. I think it would better be made part of the FieldType, at least letting you specify defaults that can be edited in the field specification. Also, I definitely see a need for FooIdEq as I'm toying with adding support for more complicated SQL right now. What I have working in a toy hacked environment:
showQuery $ do selectAll (undefined :: Pet) -- hopefully I'll make it possible to select specific fields where_ PetTypeEq Dog -- eventually I'll probably get "PetType .== Dog" to work where_ PetOwner PersonAgeLt 12 "SELECT * FROM Pet WHERE Pet.type=? AND Person.age AND Pet.id=Person.id JOIN Person"
I'm currently modifying the TH to support generating
persistFilterToJoins :: Filter val -> [(SomePersistEntity, SomePersistEntity)]
That I need in order to do this in more than a toy environment.
When there'll be something half worth showing, I'll upload to git and
invite everyone to help (since this is mostly over-my-head Haskell...
I've been learning a lot from it).
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Michael Snoyman
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Katsutoshi Itoh
wrote: Hi
I had often wanted FooIdIn, FooIdEq on Foo Persistent type. Would you support this by default?
from japan.
As Max said, glad to see that you're safe.
For FooIdEq: I don't think there is any need, since it can be expressed more succinctly with the "get" function. As for FooIdIn: this *was* a recently requested feature. Maybe we can get it in for the next release. I think it would make sense to add the In attribute to the entity itself, eg:
mkPersist [$persist| Person In name String age Int |]
Any objections?
Michael
_______________________________________________ web-devel mailing list web-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel