On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:18:12 -0600
"Chris" == Chris Smith wrote:
Hello Chris, Chris> So I was not objecting to WAI itself; but rather to seeing the Chris> announcement of Salvia greeted with a nearly-immediate "is it Chris> WAI compliant?" Hmm, you wrote: "I share some reservations about WAI. It's certainly better than using lazy I/O for high-volume web servers, but the enumerator/iteratee stuff is far less obvious than lazy I/O as an abstraction.", so it might be (due to not being native speaker) that I do not understand it properly, but, otoh, my reasoning is that if Happstack which is kind of veteran in the young Haskell web-development scene sees the value of having WAI and providing port for it, then it I believe my question is not so much off. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------