Hey all, I have a general rule of thumb: if I get confused about how I named things, I probably named them badly. For example, addStyle takes a Cassius value as an argument, while addStylesheet takes a route to a CSS file. On the other hand, addScript takes a route to a Javascript file, and addJavascript takes a Julius value. There's also addBody, which takes a Hamlet. And there's no addWidget, which is fine (it would just be id), except that it looks wrong and can lead to confusing type errors with the new polymorphic Hamlet. For example: defaultLayout $ do setTitle "Widget test" [$hamlet|This is a widget|] works fine, but: defaultLayout $ do [$hamlet|This is a widget|] setTitle "Widget test" confuses the compiler. I'm considering some renamings for Yesod 0.6 which will cause breakage, so I wanted your opinions if the changes are worth it, or if you have any better ideas. Here's what I'm thinking: addCassius :: Cassius -> Widget addJulius :: Julius -> Widget addHamlet :: Hamlet -> Widget addHtml :: Html -> Widget addHamletHead :: Hamlet -> Widget addHtmlHead :: Html -> Widget addWidget :: Widget -> Widget addStylesheet :: Route -> Widget addScript :: Route -> Widget And with the new polymorphic hamlet, I don't think wrapWidget and extractWidget are generally necessary. Nonetheless, I think I'd like to leave extractWidget, in case there is some use case I'm not thinking of. I think it's safe to remove wrapWidget, as it's easy to express it in terms of extractWidget. Thoughts? Michael