I'd like to add that sourceNull is a rather confusing name, and
sourceEmpty would be more consistent with the other libraries out
there.
See e.g.
Data.Map.null :: Map k a -> Bool
Data.Map.empty :: Map k a
Cheers,
Jasper
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Kazu Yamamoto
For the nullSource, you can actually use mempty, since Source is an instance of Monoid. I realize now that I didn't even think about this when I was writing http-conduit, and instead used `sourceList []` in a few places. I think in conduit 0.0.4 I'll include Data.Conduit.List.sourceNull, with a comment that it's just a type-restricted synonym for mempty. Sound good?
Yes, sounds great. Thank you.
--Kazu
_______________________________________________ web-devel mailing list web-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel