2010/12/20 Michael Snoyman
* Should it be yesod-base or yesod-core?
yesod-core sounds better :).
* Maybe we should leave it as yesod and create a new package called yesod-complete? (I don't particularly like this...)
Neither do I.
* Should yesod-base have a plain Yesod module, or should that be in the yesod-complete package and export all the stuff (forms, persistent) that we have right now?
I think "Yesod" module should be in 'yesod' package. See below.
* And should we split the scaffolding tool into its own package as well? This probably depends a lot on which base (base or complete) ends up getting the plain "yesod" name.
I think it should be in 'yesod' package as well. The scaffolding tool prefers using libraries from the yesod ecosystem, so I can't see the advantage of splitting it from 'yesod' package. My 2ยข. Cheers! -- Felipe.