Michael Snoyman <michael@...> writes:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Gregory Collins <greg- Ul5JJHalTl8GkDYIr3kye6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org> wrote: Michael Snoyman <michael <at> snoyman.com> writes:
But more to the point: because of WAI, we don't *have* to write the adapter, This is the "M*N" VS "M+N" argument that the Rack guys make, which would be a perfectly good argument except that for us (pretty much) M=N=2. Keep in mind that WSGI (and to a lesser extent, this applies to rack) was created in the context of a bunch of webserver backends and more than half a dozen huge Python web toolkits, any one of which probably had more person-hours invested in it than all of our stuff put together.
I don't really see your point here.
I think I would characterize the core difference between Greg's and Michael's approaches to be this: Michael = Waterfall Greg = Agile Although there may also be some minor differences in the scope that they're talking about regarding a wai.