
Gour
On Mon, 24 May 2010 19:20:02 +0300
> "Michael" ==
wrote: Michael> Snap is definitely *not* geared at shared hosting. I Michael> discussed this with Gregory a while ago, and unless he's Michael> changed his mind since, they're not interested in anything Michael> but dedicated hosting. So I would definitely say stick with Michael> FastCGI (or CGI... I'm working on some benchmarks right now).
I've asked the other day on #snapframework, and the response was "that use case is not very relevant for any of us but we know people are interested in that", so it does not sound as definite 'no', but who knows...
It would be a weekend project for someone, but that someone isn't me --
I have too many other itches to scratch. If anyone is up for tackling
this particular problem and needs help/advice on our code base, please
get in touch with me.
G
--
Gregory Collins