Well, to be fair, very few people bother to scower the archives in these situations. I can appreciate that in theory it's a good idea but I doubt if it'll ever be practically feasable. Moreover, if the topic is suitable for the list it will be discussed publically anyway. So it is imaterial whether or not the initial consultation takes place on the list. I have already contacted Neil and explained that as far as I'm concerned he can go ahead ... etc. Paul At 11:01 19/06/2007, you wrote:

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:51:40PM +0100, Paul Stanley wrote:

...

For any future queries regarding Web-Devel please feel free to drop me a line at prstanley at ntlworld.com Regards Paul (list owner/moderator)

Hi Neil, Paul

I don't know why I've missed this thread until now.

Neil. Go on and start your discussion within a new thread. I like your library. (I've already used it as you know). It's a promising alternative to many other approaches. And thanks for joining ;-)

Paul: I'd like to discuss issues like this in public. Why? This way the next person asking the same question can lookup the answer using the archive. Much more important is choosing an expressive subject so that everyone can decide in advance wether he wants to read the post or not.

If you (Paul and all others) have a different attitute post your opinion so that we may change the topic of this list if it is no longer appropriate.

Marc Weber _______________________________________________ web-devel mailing list web-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel