I'm torn on this one. I'm not going to bother retroactively doing documentation for 0.0.0; however, once I release 0.2.0, and I work on 0.4.0, I'd like people to have access to documentation on released code as well as development code. I'm not quite certain... As far as that intro page, I was providing that table more as a comparison, but I think I'll be removing it entirely. Michael On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Hartman < thomashartman1@googlemail.com> wrote:

It looks great.

My only possible nit is that it seems odd to include docu for 0.0.0 as well as 0.0.2, why not just do the latest and let the past be done?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:

...

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Michael Snoyman

...

...

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Gour wrote:

...

On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:36:51 +0200

...

...

>>>> "Simon" == Simon Hengel wrote:

Simon> My feeling is that we lack mostly short, tutorial-style Simon> introductions, that just get you started with a topic/library.

I agree.

Moreover, practically every 'framework' (except Happs) is more or less one-man show band, i.e. it works for their authors without docs, but that's not the way one can build community around it...And without some 'critical' mass of users, one is reluctant to invest time/energy into such products...Kind a catch-22. :-(

I can't speak for others, but I personally don't have a problem

investing

...

in documentation on my one-man-show libraries. In the specific case of Yesod, I *know* it's going to have some major changes in the next release, so it's not worth it right now. In general, I think the problem for library writers is that- since *we* wrote the code- we don't know what's confusing about it. As far as we're concerned, our code is beautiful, elegant, simple and self-documenting (until we look at it again six months later). We really need an outside voice to tell us what's lacking. So instead of saying "fizzbuzz has no documentation," maybe say "I saw

...

...

fizzbuzz tutorial on creating foobars, but I couldn't figure out how to extend that for wibbles. Could you write a tutorial for that?"

So I finally decided to start on the documentation front. Thanks to everyone who's kicked me to get it done, and thanks in particular to Gour for reviewing some of it for me. I'll be placing on Yesod-related documentation on a new site: http://docs.yesodweb.com/ I'm using Hakyll to generate the site, which is working very nicely. The code is all available on github (http://github.com/snoyberg/yesoddocs), so if anyone wants to make changes, you can either e-mail me or send a

wrote: the patch.

...

It's not *quite* as nice as a wiki for collaboration, but hopefully will be easier to follow. Next goal will be to put up docs on web-routes-quasi. Michael _______________________________________________ web-devel mailing list web-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel

-- Need somewhere to put your code? http://patch-tag.com Want to build a webapp? http://happstack.com