September 2010 - xmonad

Re: Issue 175 in xmonad: Click on unfocused window eaten
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 25 May '11

25 May '11

Comment #5 on issue 175 by scuz.there: Click on unfocused window eaten http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=175 Anybody know if this is possible? I'm gona try looking around but my Haskell knowledge is quite basic so I'm not expecting much. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 3

Issue 405 in xmonad: Moving thunderbird Account Settings window causes background window to jump around
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 19 May '11

19 May '11

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 405 by richard.adam: Moving thunderbird Account Settings window causes background window to jump around http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=405 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Start Mozilla Thunderbird and some other windows 2. Go to Account Settings in Thunderbird 3. Move the Account Settings window to try to see what's behind it 4. Click on a different window 5. Mouse over the thunderbird Account Settings window What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect the background window to remain the same. Instead, the background window changes to some predefined window. This prevents me from seeing the window in the background while typing into the Account Settings window. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? xmonad 0.8.1 on Gentoo Linux. Are you using an xmonad.hs? Please attach it and the output of "xmonad --recompile". Yes. Attached. xmonad --recompile has no output. Please provide any additional information below. Perhaps this problem is related to dialogs that disallow the parent window from being used. It could also be a nonconformance of thunderbird, I have no idea. Attachments: xmonad.hs 2.3 KB

1 2

Re: Issue 313 in xmonad: Merge contrib's isFullscreen and doFullFloat to core
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 07 May '11

07 May '11

Comment #6 on issue 313 by gwern0: Merge contrib's isFullscreen and doFullFloat to core http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=313 The next release from darcs will be 1.0; is there any particular reason the change hasn't been made & pushed, or this bug closed? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 2

Issue 378 in xmonad: Clean up WindowBringer interface
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 378 by MathStuf: Clean up WindowBringer interface http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=378 The attached patch adds a bringMenu' function so that the user may specify a command for it as well. In addition, the other functions are cleaned up to use cascade with the default "dmenu" command. I tried doing "darcs record", but I do not have packages that satisfy the testing version dependencies and the xmonad update from cabal has dependency solving issues with the system version. Attachments: xmonad-contrib-windowbringer-cleanup.patch 2.2 KB -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 8

Issue 406 in xmonad: Add XMonad.Hooks.ToggleHook
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 11 Apr '11

11 Apr '11

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 406 by MathStuf: Add XMonad.Hooks.ToggleHook http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=406 A while ago I sent a patch to the ML with `darcs send`. Opening a bug to track it and changing existing code to use it and reduce duplication (X.H.InsertPosition could also be made to use ToggleHooks). The patches attached are raw patches to add support and also swap X.H.FloatNext to use the ToggleHook calls. Mailing list archive link: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/2010-June/010358.html Attachments: add-toggle-hooks.patch 7.1 KB float-next-use-toggle-hook.patch 3.4 KB

1 3

Issue 368 in xmonad: Action to send subkey to a window
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 11 Apr '11

11 Apr '11

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 368 by MathStuf: Action to send subkey to a window http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=368 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. When using subkey for keybindings, it grabs any use of the subkey. 2. I tried using xdotool to send the key, but xmnad grabs this as well. What is the expected output? Send keypress to focused window. What do you see instead? xmonad grabs the simulated keypress. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 0.9 Fedora 12 x86_64 and i686 Are you using an xmonad.hs? Please attach it and the output of "xmonad --recompile". No output from xmonad --recompile. Attachments: xmonad.hs 10.0 KB -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 1

Re: Issue 317 in xmonad: Implement a working X.U.putSelection
by codesite-noreply＠google.com 10 Mar '11

10 Mar '11

Comment #22 on issue 317 by wirtwo...(a)gmail.com: Implement a working X.U.putSelection http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=317 Issue 365 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

1 7

updating.... in xmobar
by Jacob Alexandersson 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Hey all, I just started trying xmonad out, and I really ilke it. I've used ratpoison in the past but eventually gave it up. xmonad seems to work better for me so far. I realize this is a xmobar question, but I am guessing there are people on this list that uses xmobar also. I have a .xmobarrc which looks like follows: <snip> Config { font = "-*-Fixed-Bold-R-Normal-*-13-*-*-*-*-*-*-*" , bgColor = "black" , fgColor = "grey" , position = TopW L 100 , lowerOnStart = True , commands = [ Run Cpu ["-L","3","-H","50","--normal","green","--high","red"] 10 , Run Memory ["-t","Mem: <usedratio>%"] 10 , Run Swap [] 10 , Run Date "%a %b %_d %l:%M" "date" 10 , Run Com "uname" ["-s","-r"] "blaj" 36000 , Run StdinReader ] , sepChar = "%" , alignSep = "}{" , template = "%StdinReader% }{ %blaj% %cpu% | %memory% * %swap% <fc=#ee9a00>%date%</fc>" } </snip> ...and in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs I have: <snip> ... xmproc <- spawnPipe "/usr/bin/xmobar /home/jcx/.xmobarrc" ... </snip> All I get is "updating..." where %StdinReader% is placed. Is this correct?? Am I missing something? cheers, Jacob.

3 3

darcs patch: Note things to update each release. (and 2 more)
by Adam Vogt 31 Dec '10

31 Dec '10

3 patches for repository aavogt@code.haskell.org:/srv/code/xmonad: Mon Mar 22 11:06:22 EDT 2010 Adam Vogt <vogt.adam(a)gmail.com> * Note things to update each release. Sat Apr 3 14:11:15 EDT 2010 Adam Vogt <vogt.adam(a)gmail.com> * Update comments describing `recompile' Sat Apr 3 14:13:54 EDT 2010 Adam Vogt <vogt.adam(a)gmail.com> * Update util/GenerateManpage to be pandoc-1.4 compatible

2 1

darcs patch: get rid of zombies in a more portable way
by Tomas Janousek 12 Dec '10

12 Dec '10

Sun Apr 11 20:55:10 CEST 2010 Tomas Janousek <tomi(a)nomi.cz> * get rid of zombies in a more portable way FreeBSD and OpenBSD don't support the signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) way of dealing with them. Wikipedia quote on the issue: "POSIX.1-2001 allows a parent process to elect for the kernel to automatically reap child processes that terminate by setting the disposition of SIGCHLD to SIG_IGN or by setting the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag for the SIGCHLD signal; Linux 2.6 kernels adhere to this behavior while FreeBSD supports only the latter of these methods. Because of historical differences between System V and BSD behaviors with regard to ignoring SIGCHLD, calling wait remains the most portable paradigm for cleaning up after forked child processes." -- Tomáš Janoušek, a.k.a. Liskni_si, http://work.lisk.in/

5 4