Hopefully this patch fixes the ambiguity. That state information (that int parameter) as to which aspect ratio layout to pick is now hidden, since I could not think of a good reason for it not to be the default. * On Sunday, January 25 2009, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
Applied, thanks. A few issues with documentation: - what does Int (0 in your example) stands for? - "The numbers are directly proportional to the area given, with the master window getting the most if you have an ascending list." -- does it mean that area of master is proportional to the last number in the list? I think it should be more clear.
-- Roman I. Cheplyaka (aka Feuerbach @ IRC) http://ro-che.info/docs/xmonad.hs _______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/xmonad