
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:39:33PM +0800, brian wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:50 PM, Andrea Rossato
wrote: Some of you may be thinking I'm just rewriting Ion3 in Haskell... my screen shots could even lead you to think I'm *not* using xmonad at all...;)
Sorry to be a little off-topic, but if we're bringing back Ion's features, let's please talk about the idea ...
There's a problem with that "we"...;) It is just me... Since I used to like some features I coded those features for xmonad, which does not aim to be a Ion3 replacement (or at least I'm not aware of that). And I implemented those features according to the idea I had of the meaning and the working of those features. This is, I think, the problem we are facing at the present time. Andrea ps: regarding the specific feature you were talking about: I didn't know it existed (or perhaps I just didn't get what you need). ;-)