7 Nov
2011
7 Nov
'11
6:04 p.m.
On 8 November 2011 08:56, Jochen Keil
How about a release every 6 months? Someone mentioned this already and I think it makes sense. New users would see that the project is under active development. In addition they would be able to get some very recent code without having to fiddle with darcs etc.
I'm not a fan of "let's release just because we need a release every 6 months": I think a feature-based release ("do we have enough changes to warrant a release?") makes more sense, albeit with the uncertainty of a looming deadline to make people consider releasing. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com