
14 Nov
2007
14 Nov
'07
10:24 a.m.
On 11/13/07, David Roundy
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Valery V. Vorotyntsev wrote:
Can we use more general type in XConfig definition?
I didn't think we could. Does it actually work? I'd think that'd break
And it did. :) See http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=89#c2
things. i.e. there's no way I can see to change a function (XConfig l -> a) to a function (XConfig Layout -> a), which we'd need to do.
Is there any reason other than elegance that you'd like to do this?
No reason, just my stupidity. Sorry. -- vvv