22 Jul
2008
22 Jul
'08
12:05 p.m.
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 19:07:22 Miernik wrote:
miernik@przehyba ~ $ ps -o %mem,args -p 25681 %MEM COMMAND 0.5 awesome
That's why I care about size - because RAM is about 25$ per GB now, so keeping the whole GHC in RAM costs 3$ wasted RAM space, and also power consumption (electricity cost) of the RAM chips.
You don't need GHC to *run* xmonad, only to *rebuild*. Just pack it and go.
While I used xmonad for a few days, now I have awesome as my window manager since a few hours. Can you give me any reason in what xmonad is better then awesome, any reason to switch back?
I don't know Your case. May be You should switch further to twm or something more minimalistic. And it would even save You one more penny! -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff