
6 Jul
2012
6 Jul
'12
12:57 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM,
Quoting Daniel Trstenjak
: If you look a tad further down the patch list, you'll see it ends in ~/.cache/xmonad, presumably following the XDG spec, which was designed exactly to avoid namespace pollution.
What's the darcs way for cleaning up a set of patches?
There's darcs amend-record, but I don't think it's necessary. This history is nicely transparent about how and why each change was made.
Agree. As long as it's documenting how and why something changed and the previous version wasn't incomplete or broken it's ok. What you should avoid is commits which do not build. That breaks bisecting.