me:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:57:31AM -0400, Braden Shepherdson wrote:
I'm not going to become the next arossato if the consensus goes against using PlainConfig. I think it's a good idea, but I respect the views of the other devs, and if this isn't a direction we want to go in, I won't storm off. I'm just of the opinion that this is a good idea, and I want to see it happen.
I see no reason why you can't develop in in contrib, now, and move it over when ready and/or agreed upon. Was there push back on that?
Similarly, would there be push back if I developed NewConfig (now with monads! thanks gwern) in contrib? Perhaps we need a "selection of the fittest" approach to improving config. (Also, now, I'm just curious.)
Any new config systems in contrib are welcome. The more, the merrier.