
6 Dec
2009
6 Dec
'09
4:17 a.m.
* On Saturday, December 05 2009, Don Stewart wrote:
Nice observation. Why don't we just get rid of it and use mappend now?
-- Don
vogt.adam:
Sat Dec 5 18:36:11 EST 2009 Adam Vogt
* Generalize the type of (<+>). It can be used for keybindings too.
Firstly, there is the backwards-compatibility issue to deal with after removing <+>. The same applies for composeAll. Also, I find the <+> operator to be slightly more convenient to write than `mappend`. Only the first point is an issue that could be addressed by a textual substitution-based config updater (or better-yet, one using the AST parsed from haskell-src-exts), but that has not been done yet. -- Adam