Re: [xmonad] RFC: XMonad.Prompt.ConfirmPrompt module

Hello Carsten, What do you think of hub.darcs.net? it supports darcs, project forks, and also issue reports. I liked the looks of phabricator, but check this "fact": "Phabricator has more than 300,000 lines of PHP, so there are probably at least sixty or seventy million security vulnerabilities in the project." Personally i am neutral on moving to git, I think darcs is robust. However, there is no reason why there shouldn't be any git mirrors :) In fact, i tried doing that in the past. but I don't know if there's a solution to maintain git and darcs synced.. 2015-03-12 12:24 GMT-06:00 Carsten Mattner :

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:

...

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Peter Jones wrote:

...

Carsten Mattner writes:

...

If a migration happens it should host the git repo on git.haskell.org, googlecode.com (where the issue tracker is) and wherever else,

Looks like the issue tracker will need to move somewhere too:

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/google-to-close-google...

Yep, just saw that and was drafting a "we need to move everything soonish" message....

I say move to git.haskell.org and phabricator.haskell.org as the primary place as github refuses to fix their code review system. Github's systems works enough to seem nice but falls down if you actually review code:

1. no patch history 2. horrendous comment system in reviews 3. new comments as replies to previous ones are hidden and hard to find if you don't manually look for them in the code comments

I don't want to be direct, but github's code review and comment system is superbad. _______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad