On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:45:12AM +0100, Jamie Webb wrote:
This is a new layout which is very similar to David's Mosaic, but produces different tilings. The algorithm is simpler, but I think it gives more useful results. It divides the space in a more balanced way, in particular trying to avoid very narrow windows.
This looks pretty nice, although it is less flexible. The algorithms that Mosaic uses need to be totally rewritten, but I like the ideas behind them (which is to write down a "goodness" function and then minimize it). The trouble is that discrete minimization is hard... but the real reason that Mosaic has languished is that Combo works better for me. Dynamical tiling just has trouble competing with static tiling intelligently laid out. Particularly when the dynamical tiling is constrained to display all windows--very often there *is* no useful way to display all windows. So if I get around to working on Mosaic again, I'll probably work on finding a way of mingling it with something like Tabbed, so that it can ensure that every visible window is usefully visible (e.g. no xterms less than 80 chars wide or two chars tall, and no emacsen less than 80 chars wide or two dozen chars tall). This will also have the benefit of both making the algorithm faster (fewer windows displayed means exponentially fewer possible tilings) and as a result simpler (e.g. we may be able to try exhaustive search of tilings, provided window areas are kept fixed). The trouble is figuring out which window to hide when the user clicks on one of the tabs. Plus, I don't have much time for xmonad hacking. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University