Re: [xmonad] ppVisible with 3 screens

Hi, are you sure that it doesn't work with only one screen? Even with only one screen "getSortByXineramaRule" returns a list with 9 workspaces (I'm using 9 workspaces) in it, right? Logicaly the sorting after the let is wrong then, but there should be no error. But like I said: I'm a haskell noob, maybe I'm totaly wrong :) How would I add that fallback? You wrote some ], but I'm not sure how such a fallback looks @haskell myXineramaSorter = do srt <- getSortByXineramaRule let prm (one:two:rest) = two:one:rest return (prm . srt) Felix On 09. October 2010 - 20:18, Adam Vogt wrote:

Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:18:58 -0400 From: Adam Vogt To: xmonad@haskell.org Subject: Re: [xmonad] ppVisible with 3 screens

* On Friday, October 08 2010, Felix Blanke wrote:

...

Hello,

thanks a lot for your work!

It works :) The short version

"let prm (one:two:rest) = two:one:rest"

is enough, because I only need to switch the first two elements. With this hack I don't need the colour thing.

Thanks again!

Regards, Felix

If you end up using that config with only one screen, that expression will throw an exception. XMonad will most likely catch it, but the recovery is to try again. Arguably xmonad should do something smarter, but until something changes there, you'd get an infinite loop.

So add a fallback case to the definition:

] let prm (one:two:rest) = two:one:rest ] prm x = x

-- Adam _______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/xmonad ---end quoted text---