12 Apr
2010
12 Apr
'10
9:19 a.m.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:05:30PM +0200, Tomá? Janou?ek wrote:
Better wait. Somehting else must be wrong then, and it may as well be in GHCs libraries. I'll try to setup some test cases for this.
No. Nobody said that OpenBSD conforms to that POSIX-something. Just apply the patch I just posted to the list and be happy :-).
Yes, thanks for the patch. (There are still some strange things wrong with OpenBSD; at least sigaction(2) should be POSIX compliant; on the other hand, the implementation of signal(3) seems to differ from what the manpage says) Ciao, Kili